The Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Mechanism (SDLAM) (Glossary) is a way to change the 2,750 gigalitres (GL) target if we can achieve similar or even better environmental outcomes for the rivers, wetlands and birds and fish using less water. It’s a provision written into the 2012 Basin Plan and agreed by Basin States and the Commonwealth.

This process helps to achieve the Basin Plan’s social, economic and environmental outcomes.

Using less water

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan’s 2,750 GL target is only enough to protect low-lying floodplains. There simply isn’t enough water to simulate the large-scale floods needed to reach the mid- to upper-levels of the floodplains.

The Basin Plan was developed to achieve environmental outcomes for the river and its floodplains: it’s about more than just the amount – or volume - of water.

Using infrastructure to deliver water to high value sites, and changing the way dams and rivers are managed can help us to achieve better environmental outcomes with less water. In many cases, environmental works like flow regulators, pumps and channels are the only way to get water to many of the sites that need it. This approach works when there is not enough water to flood wetlands naturally.  In some areas, options to ease delivery constraints are also being investigated to allow higher flows down the river. Creating the large flows required to flood these areas naturally would need massive volumes of water and would damage private land and public infrastructure, such as bridges and roads.  

Large-scale environmental works have been completed as part of the Living Murray Program and are already delivering results at Chowilla Floodplain, Gunbower Forest, Hattah Lakes, Koondrook-Perricoota Forest, Lindsay Island and Mulcra Island. We are seeing improvements in vegetation health, successful waterbird breeding, and increases in fish populations: see Victoria’s Basin Plan report card.

Offset projects

Each of the Basin states (Glossary) submitted proposals for offset projects.  Water Ministers from each of the Basin states and the Commonwealth agreed to 36 projects in June 2017. Victoria is a proponent or co-proponent of 22 of the 36 agreed projects.

These “offset projects” mean that better outcomes can be achieved using less water. The Murray-Darling Basin Authority has determined that water recovery target can be reduced by 605 GL through these projects. This means:

By delivering these offset projects, we can achieve better outcomes for the environment and communities with less water.

Adapting the Basin Plan’s 2,750 GL target: a win – win for all

The Federal Government allowed an amendment using the SDLAM to reduce the 2,750 gigalitres (GL) target by 605 GL to 2145 GL in May 2018.

The 605 GL amendment:

  • reduces the amount of water for the environment we need to recover, and
  • improves the environmental benefits in the Basin

The 605 GL offset projects have been assessed by all five Basin states and the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA). Modelling - drawing on work of CSIRO - has shown that the projects will deliver outcomes equivalent to 605 GL of environmental water.

The Basin’s floodplains are better off with this amendment:

  • we will achieve the environmental benefits that the 2750 GL would have provided with only 2145 GL
  • environmental needs for the mid to upper floodplain will be met using environmental infrastructure, even in dry periods
  • all of South Australia's targets set for Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth will continue to be achieved.

In some cases, the works projects are the only way sites can be watered, no matter how much water farmers give up under the Basin Plan. The works will protect these places during droughts and under a drier future; they secure the community’s investment in water recovery.

When the Basin Plan was developed, all Basin states agreed to the SDLAM allowing the water recovery target to be reduced by up to 650 GL. The 605 GL adjustment is within the agreed amount.

Modelling shows the SDLAM projects deliver substantial improvements for the whole river system compared with pre-Basin Plan conditions.

While the ‘ecological elements’ score* in some reaches is slightly lower compared with the 2,750 GL scenario, the reduction is only one to three per cent which is statistically and ecologically insignificant.

*The ecological elements score is a CSIRO developed method of calculating the ecological outcomes that are achieved in each river reach. The score considers outcomes for birds, fish and vegetation.

Environmental works will be used on large floodplain sites like Gunbower Forest, Hattah Lakes, Lindsay and Wallpolla Islands. They will also be used to water smaller floodplains all along the river.  

As well as making sure the floodplains are healthy at the sites with environmental works, the SDLAM amendment retains all the environmental benefits to the river and floodplains that would have been achieved under the 2,750 GL scenario.

Many people are particularly concerned about the declining health of Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth due to high salinity and low water levels.

The water available for these sites has substantially increased compared to pre-Basin Plan conditions, and they remain a priority. Under the SDLAM scenario, all flow and salinity targets set by South Australia will be met and in some cases exceeded.

In early 2017, the Victorian and New South Wales governments commissioned an Independent Expert Panel to review the offsets mechanism and provide a better understanding of how it works.

The Independent Expert Panel’s report has given the Victorian Government the information needed to inform our decisions, and to have greater confidence that the equivalent environmental outcomes can be achieved through the offset projects.

The report helped to ensure that decisions about offsets were based on the best available information, including expert advice.

The Panel’s report is now also publicly available:

In 2017, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority proposed a number of amendments to the Basin Plan process linked to the Northern Basin Review. This included a recommendation that the water recovery target for the Northern Basin be reduced from 390 gigalitres (GL) to 320 GL.

The proposed amendments to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan were subsequently disallowed by the Senate in February 2018.

Governments and the MDBA have committed to there being no negative impacts on triple bottom line outcomes in the southern basin as a result of the Northern Basin Review. If any negative impacts are identified, they will be addressed by the MDBA as part of the established review processes for the Basin Plan.

Page last updated: 13/06/2018